<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knickerpicker.com &#8211; A revolutionay lingerie changing room</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-lingerie-post.com/2008/02/knickerpickercom-a-revolutionay-lingerie-changing-room/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-lingerie-post.com/2008/02/knickerpickercom-a-revolutionay-lingerie-changing-room/</link>
	<description>The most beautiful lingerie and swimwear in the world...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:54:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.the-lingerie-post.com/2008/02/knickerpickercom-a-revolutionay-lingerie-changing-room/comment-page-1/#comment-40639</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-lingerie-post.com/2008/02/knickerpickercom-a-revolutionay-lingerie-changing-room/#comment-40639</guid>
		<description>Hi Mandolina

Thanks for the great article in &#039;08. We have now changed the site and have a number of new features as well as shifting from an affiliate site to selling direct.

We have improved the site in a bid to make online shopping more fun. Would love to know what you think - hopefully the increase in the number of models you can view items on, the clear and simple navigation, competitive price offers and the fun and relevance of interacting with the models to make online shopping more engaging and fun is still seen as original and positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mandolina</p>
<p>Thanks for the great article in &#8217;08. We have now changed the site and have a number of new features as well as shifting from an affiliate site to selling direct.</p>
<p>We have improved the site in a bid to make online shopping more fun. Would love to know what you think &#8211; hopefully the increase in the number of models you can view items on, the clear and simple navigation, competitive price offers and the fun and relevance of interacting with the models to make online shopping more engaging and fun is still seen as original and positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gill Fernandez</title>
		<link>http://www.the-lingerie-post.com/2008/02/knickerpickercom-a-revolutionay-lingerie-changing-room/comment-page-1/#comment-30608</link>
		<dc:creator>Gill Fernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-lingerie-post.com/2008/02/knickerpickercom-a-revolutionay-lingerie-changing-room/#comment-30608</guid>
		<description>I spotted knickpicker when it first launched and at first thought it was a great idea, even to the extent of thinking about something similar for our site (www.ever-so-sexy.com) but on reflection I am not so sure it is as exciting a development as I first thought.  The reasons behind my second thoughts are this:
1. Women are more than three destinct shapes.
2. People buying lingerie offline don&#039;t have a catwalk parade of three differently shaped models to judge what will suit them - they know what will suit them.
3. Men buying lingerie as a present for a woman are &quot;close&quot; enough to that woman to know her shape, know what she currently wears and know what suits her. - OK so sometimes they are a bit vague on the size issue, but this software does not solve that problem.
4. Underwear buying is (unless its a plain woollen vest) is buying a dream, whether its being bought by a man or a woman and so for a while they do want the &quot;ideal&quot; vision in their mind.  People are not stupid - they know that the glamorous lingerie may not look quite so good as on the model, but they don&#039;t really want to be reminded about that when they purchase the lingerie.
So my considered judgement of this development is that it is a fun gimick but will not have a series impact on the decisions of the online lingerie buyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spotted knickpicker when it first launched and at first thought it was a great idea, even to the extent of thinking about something similar for our site (www.ever-so-sexy.com) but on reflection I am not so sure it is as exciting a development as I first thought.  The reasons behind my second thoughts are this:<br />
1. Women are more than three destinct shapes.<br />
2. People buying lingerie offline don&#8217;t have a catwalk parade of three differently shaped models to judge what will suit them &#8211; they know what will suit them.<br />
3. Men buying lingerie as a present for a woman are &#8220;close&#8221; enough to that woman to know her shape, know what she currently wears and know what suits her. &#8211; OK so sometimes they are a bit vague on the size issue, but this software does not solve that problem.<br />
4. Underwear buying is (unless its a plain woollen vest) is buying a dream, whether its being bought by a man or a woman and so for a while they do want the &#8220;ideal&#8221; vision in their mind.  People are not stupid &#8211; they know that the glamorous lingerie may not look quite so good as on the model, but they don&#8217;t really want to be reminded about that when they purchase the lingerie.<br />
So my considered judgement of this development is that it is a fun gimick but will not have a series impact on the decisions of the online lingerie buyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

